Streaming LensANALYSIS · DATA · REPORTS
EN FR

FAQ — the questions people actually ask.

Questions from operators, investors, C-levels framing a decision. Grouped by field: vertical drama (China, US, Europe, Ukraine, Africa), African OTT (SVOD graveyard, mobile-money, Canal+), and how Lens works. 23 questions. If yours isn't here, write — reply within 72h.

Vertical drama — China, where the market started.

What exactly is duanju?

Duanju (短剧, "short dramas") is the Chinese name for the vertical drama format: 60–100 episodes of 1–2 minutes each, shot vertically for smartphone, edited with a cliffhanger every 90 seconds. Born 2021–2022 in China, exploded 2023–2024 via Hongguo (ByteDance), Douyin, Kuaishou. Domestic Chinese market: CNY 50.44B (≈ $7.0B) in 2024 and a forecast CNY 67.79B (≈ $9.4B) for 2025 (iiMedia; yuan figures converted at the annual average rate, Federal Reserve G.5A: 7.1957 CNY/USD in 2024, 7.1875 in 2025; Q1 2026: 6.93, OECD). Duanju is to vertical drama what K-drama is to traditional series: the cultural archetype with its own narrative vocabulary (time travel, amnesiac billionaire, post-humiliation revenge).

Who are the major vertical drama players in China?

Four blocks: (1) Hongguo (红果, ByteDance) — embedded in Douyin, free ad-supported, dominant in domestic MAU; (2) Kuaishou and its Kuaishou Drama app — similar model, #2 distribution; (3) Tencent Video / WeChat Channels — recent vertical pivot, less dominant; (4) independent studios (Shaanxi Radio, Zhongqi, Linghe, Mango TV) producing and licensing to platforms. Structure: ByteDance and Kuaishou hold distribution, studios hold IPs.

How long does it take to produce a duanju episode?

In China: a full arc (~80 episodes) shoots in 7–14 days with a lean crew (15–25 people), pre- and post-production in 3–4 weeks total. Average budget $100k–$300k per arc, i.e. $1.2–$3.5k per episode. The most efficient studios run 3–4 arcs in parallel. The cadence is incompatible with classic Hollywood processes — which is why Netflix/Disney enter via licensing deals, not in-house production.

Vertical drama — who dominates outside China.

Who dominates vertical drama in the US?

Two players capture ~60–70% of the non-China market: ReelShort (Crazy Maple Studio, subsidiary of Shenzhen-listed COL Group) and DramaBox (Storymatrix, backed by Tencent). ReelShort opened the way late 2022 with coin-unlock IAP: CNY 5.72B (≈ $796M) of revenue in 2025 in the accounts filed by COL Group. DramaBox arrived 2023, hybrid subscription + IAP model: $323M of revenue in 2024, as declared to Media Partners Asia. Behind: ShortMax, GoodShort, My Drama (Holywater), ShortTV (Indian). Market outside China, US included: $2.7B in 2025, $3.6B in 2026, $9.5B projected for 2031 (Media Partners Asia).

Who dominates in Europe?

No native European champion. The European market is served by the same US apps (ReelShort, DramaBox, ShortMax) with partial localization. Native localization: My Drama (Holywater, Ukraine) is starting to produce in German and French. Fox Entertainment launched a European studio. KOCCA (Korea Creative Content Agency) pushes Korean formats. France/Italy/Spain: no dominant local operator; import market where global platforms take 90%+.

Why does Ukraine play a major role in vertical drama?

Three structural reasons. (1) Holywater, based in Kyiv, is the #3 non-China vertical drama player globally with My Drama — founded by Bogdan Nesvit, positioned on romance + thriller at industrial cadence. (2) Production costs 40–60% below US for equivalent technical quality. (3) Volume: Ukrainian studios have been producing for ReelShort, DramaBox, ShortMax white-label since 2023. Even the war did not slow production — it consolidated in western Ukraine and in Polish and Romanian diasporas. For an investor, Ukraine is the most competitive production base on the English/European segment today.

What about India?

Major emerging market. JioHotstar (Disney+ Hotstar + Reliance Jio merger 2024) launched a vertical drama slot. Kuku TV, Stage, ShortTV (Indian) and Viggo operate locally. Opportunity ~$3B by 2028. Specificity: massive smartphone penetration, very low ARPU → massive ad-supported + UPI micro-payments + language tiering (Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Bengali). A model of interest to Africa for similar structural reasons.

Vertical drama in Africa.

Is there a vertical drama player in Africa?

No dominant native operator yet. Global apps (ReelShort, DramaBox) serve African diasporas in the US and Europe but don't invest in local production. Showmax (under Canal+) is testing vertical formats in Johannesburg, Nollywood Nigeria adapts short-format for YouTube Shorts. The real deposit: Nigeria has creative infrastructure, mobile-money purchasing power is there. What's missing: a local ad-supported operator at duanju cadence. Explicit thesis in VI part V + dedicated Africa Streaming annex.

African OTT — SVOD graveyard and winners.

What are the African SVOD graveyard cases?

Six platforms documented (part IV, at least $500M in documented losses): iROKOtv ($30M lost in Nigeria from 2015 to 2020 on $100M+ spent; launched 2011; stopped taking naira and exited Nigeria in 2023, service still running outside Africa) — Netflix Africa (chronic underperformance; service still running, no African loss published, left out of the total) — Showmax (ZAR 8.8B, ≈ $482M, of trading losses over FY2023–FY2025, MultiChoice; shutdown 30 April 2026) — Africa Magic Go (DStv, shut 2019) — Buni.tv (Kenya, 2015–2018) — Kwesé Play (Econet, 2017–2019). Common pattern: imported model (catalog pricing, Visa/Mastercard subscription, SVOD marketing), not adapted to local rails, unsustainable burn rate.

Who are the OTT winners in Africa today?

Four blocks. (1) Canal+ / MultiChoice — structural dominant since Canal+ took effective control of MultiChoice on 22 September 2025, 54 countries via DStv + Canal+ + Showmax. (2) YouTube + TikTok — young-adult time spent, ad-supported. (3) Boomplay audio, Transsnet. (4) Telco operators — Orange, MTN, Airtel — bundling streaming + data + collecting via mobile-money. Netflix survives in diaspora + urban elite. Local plays like Marodi.tv (Senegal) on editorial niches.

Why has Netflix underperformed in Africa?

Three reasons (part III). (1) Pricing: $10–15/mo subscription inaccessible to 95%+ of the market; Mobile tier at $3–5/mo under-invested in marketing. (2) Payment rails: Netflix requires card, not direct mobile-money. Chargeback 15–25% on Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana — unacceptable. (3) Catalog: high-end productions (Lionheart, Blood Sisters) but no pipeline at local cadence. Netflix's real competitor in Africa: Canal+ pay-TV + piracy + YouTube.

Mobile-money streaming: which operators matter?

Five major rails. M-Pesa (Safaricom) — oldest and deepest, 30M+ active users (Kenya, Tanzania, DRC). MTN MoMo (MTN, 15+ countries) — 60M+ users. Airtel Money (14 countries) — Central/East Africa challenger. Orange Money (francophone + North Africa) — dominant Ivory Coast, Senegal, Mali, Cameroon. Wave (Senegalese YC fintech) — slashed prices, West Africa disruptor. Interoperability progressing but still partial.

The Canal+ / MultiChoice deal: what consequences?

Cleared by the South African competition authorities under public interest conditions; Canal+ declared its offer unconditional, all regulatory conditions met, on 22 September 2025 (Canal+). Consequences: (1) massive consolidation — Canal+ and MultiChoice under a single owner; (2) end of price war, ARPU stabilized; (3) reinforced leverage vs. sports leagues (Premier League, LaLiga, CAF); (4) DStv-dependent niche platforms weakened. Netflix and Amazon not directly threatened.

SVOD vs AVOD in Africa — what's the difference?

SVOD = paid subscription ($2–$20/mo) → 15–25M subscriber ceiling continent-wide. AVOD = free ad-supported → ceiling = all African internet users (650M+ mobile). African SVOD grows on affluent urban + diaspora. AVOD grows on mass (YouTube, TikTok, Facebook Watch + future local AVODs). Lens thesis: the volume opportunity is on AVOD + freemium, revenue per minute is lower but addressable audience is 40× larger. Winning model: AVOD first, monetize via targeted mobile-money ad spots, freemium tier with IAP for top 5–10% premium.

Vertical drama — economics and production.

What's the production budget for a vertical drama?

Three tiers. Domestic China: $1.2k–$3.5k per episode. Ukraine / Eastern Europe white-label: $4k–$8k per episode. US domestic: $12k–$25k per episode. Total for an 80-episode arc: $100k China, $350k Ukraine, $1M+ US. Apps targeting >60% gross margin don't have a choice — they produce in China or Ukraine, distribute in the US.

How many episodes in a typical arc?

Standard: 60–100 episodes of 1–2 minutes, i.e. 80–180 minutes per arc. Coin-unlock placed between ep 5–10. Cliffhanger every 90 seconds. Arc consumed across 2–5 back-to-back evenings. "Complete rate" optimized around 15–25% by ReelShort/DramaBox.

How does a vertical drama make money?

Three models (VI ch4). Coin-unlock IAP (ReelShort): first ep free, next via in-app coins ($10–$30/arc). ARPU $60–$120 on converters. Hybrid subscription + IAP (DramaBox): monthly subscription + premium IAP. Ad-supported freemium (Hongguo, My Drama early-stage): free with ads, ARPU $5–$15 but 10× larger audience.

What is the IP Factory?

Central thesis of VI report. The app is a form factor — copyable in 6 months. What endures: the machine that turns capital into a portfolio of exploitable rights (casting, script, production, localization, rights mgmt, distribution). The app with access to this inventory has a structural advantage. ReelShort builds via Crazy Maple Studio. DramaBox via Storymatrix. Fox attempts via partnership. Netflix/Disney can't do it (incompatible cadence). Details ch7.

Streaming Lens — product, pricing, MCP.

What makes you different from Omdia, Gartner, Ampere?

Single-author, two markets covered deeply instead of twenty-seven flat, 10× lower price, 10× shorter update cycle. Lens is not a replacement for Omdia — it's a precise complement on markets where generalist firms are late (vertical drama) or structurally blind (African OTT, lacking fieldwork).

How can I try before buying?

Free teaser on each report (one work address, no automated nurture). Free API key for the newsletter MCP silo. Free 15–30 min framing call if your question is specific.

Pricing — quick recap.

Explorer free (teasers + newsletter). MCP data silo: access on request. Raw report 5,000€ (469–527 page PDF + Excel + atlas). Report with advisory on request. Advisory by the engagement: 1,000€/day, strategic briefing on quote. Quoted mission beyond 5 days. Full detail at /pricing.

How do I contest a number?

Write to ludovic@streaming-radar.com. Send the source, date, method. Reply within 72h. If you're right, the number is updated and you're cited inline (permanent, with LinkedIn/site link).

Does the MCP work with ChatGPT / Cursor?

Yes, with all MCP-compatible clients. Claude.ai and Claude Desktop are most mature, ChatGPT is arriving progressively, Cursor and Continue.dev already operational. The server follows the Anthropic spec (modelcontextprotocol.io).

A question not in this FAQ?